🔗 Share this article

Turns out the manager endured defeat by lower-league opposition. Survive losing a crucial European final versus a particularly poor Spurs sides for many years. He could survive losing at home against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, undermining some of the club’s best academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. But there was a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s championship campaign, Amorim came at the executive and seems to have missed. The most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated his squad for losing individual battles crumbling in the face of the intense pressure and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most feared sporting directors.

And frankly, this entire bruising episode seems to paint the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to regard Jason Wilcox as little more than a drudge in the United exoskeleton: a man whose appointment was due largely to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive before him, he has demonstrated as one of football's strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which United’s mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

A Tactical Clash Regarding Formation & Ideology

For example, it was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas faced pushback. However, these judgements carry more weight when issued by a man of a man the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox might agree to outline his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is departing with a full payout, without any penalty clause activated. The director speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – function on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, probably we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

The Supreme Authority In Command

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the directives of his line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his preference for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to embrace data science and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he announced that the team's approach to football “shall be determined by this group”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in industry and sailing. Most importantly he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, simply better. Who else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a modern arena that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

The Modern Football Order: Executives Over Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier football. Historically, teams mistakenly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees like managers, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to go into an organization and see their vision through to completion. But how many businesses have such individuals set up? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Far preferable to invest the real power where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the strategy by the directors and appoint someone who can tailor their methods to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the food, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or fails to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role is increasingly less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of literal children into Europe and wins domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined while those individuals who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Game: Accountability for the Few

And possibly in a small way this is simply corporate governance in action: the rise of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss them for playing excessively that system. Hire the process guy and then discard him for taking excessive time. And above all be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.